The absence of proof isn’t the proof of absence

“The absence of proof isn’t the proof of absence”

[...] recognizes that people who don’t believe in God can never say with certainty that one doesn’t exist; [...] not trying to support or rule out any particular claim but simply suggesting that it’s healthy to imagine possibilities.

(Some paraphrasing): Reducing the mystery doesn’t reduce the awe.

..more..

Like this:

Be the first to like this post.

This entry was posted on August 22, 2011 at 4:25 PM and is filed under Stuff . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed.

The absence of proof isn’t the proof of absence

Like this:

Follow “”